Monday, April 29, 2024
HomeMafiyaTrue Lies: Canada's Global Research Trolls the Internet

True Lies: Canada’s Global Research Trolls the Internet

Abu Al-Baghdadi

A completely fictitious report yesterday from Canada’s Global Research stated Edward Snowden has released NSA Documents showing ISIS Leader Abu Bakr Al Baghdadi was trained by Mossad, working with U.S. and British intelligence, to create the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS).

A little research (not “Global” Research, mind, but still) led to the quick determination that Snowden has made no public statements, nor released any NSA documents, on the reported recruitment of Al Baghdadi by Mossad. 

A Google search for “Mossad Al Baghdadi NSA” revealed that the bogus report had been republished on 24,000 Internet news websites, including Alex Jone’s Infowars, by this morning.

Canadian journalist Kyle Matthews published a table showing Global Research, founded by Russian professor Michael Chossudovsky in Canada, as “part of Putin’s propaganda orgs.”

matthews

Daniel Hopsicker
Daniel Hopsickerhttp://www.madcowprod.com
Daniel Hopsicker is an investigative journalist and the author of two books on transnational crime, Welcome to Terrorland and Barry & the Boys.
RELATED ARTICLES

28 COMMENTS

  1. blah blah blah blah blah. the world never lacks for anti-semitic assholes, on both the the right and the left. at least the ones in love with global research can spell.

  2. Daniele, very well said.
    GR is one of the best enet journals . A trustwothy and an informative one. Looks like the author of this site doesn’t like the truth,so he calls it a propaganda.
    As to you, Daniel Hopsicker, i will never come back to your site and will tell all my friends not to.

  3. Bible: “Whoever is free from any sin, trow the first rock”
    I think it is not so hard to understand it. isnt it?

    I follow GB on daily base since 1 year. It’s a very informative portal with many different sources, some good some not. GB gave me the possibility to discover other informative blogs n websites. I would definitivly donate to GB if i had any spare money. But for you Daniel, who literally “spit” on the job of the others by writing an ignorant article like that, i wouldnt give a cent.

  4. Global Research is a news aggregator; it publishes stories from numberous sources. Their policy is to err on the side of publishing questionable materials, rather than on the side of censorship. Note that the organization does not call itself “Global Fact Checker.”

    Readers who are ignorant and dependent enough to demand reporting from a “final authority” get what they deserve, at FOX, CNN, NYT and Global Research: A flase world view that confirms their own bias and serves their emotional needs. Global Research readers who are critical of what they read, and evaluate stories in context with their provenance and related information from a variety of sources get vital information from Global Research: Starting points for finding important information excluded from broadcast media.

    The AIPAC PR people and others who dominate this discussion thread don’t like that, but then, they are paid not to like it.

  5. Mr. Hopsicker, Enjoying Your Guest Interview/Talk etc. on Caravan to Midnight and now I’m on your email list. The work You both do is GREAT, Knowledgeable, Historical and Mentally Newsworthy for all awake and for newbie’s. Seasons Best and
    Happy New Years…-eh!

  6. Daniel, I have contributed to your efforts by buying your work, and have read and disseminated your website articles on Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn and Google+. I hope its brought some custom your way.

    Yes some of the articles on Global Research are off beam. Some of them shy away from the truth. It is a mixed bag of a site with varying levels of competence in its contributors.

    If you’re going to call a guy out over a typo, be aware that you’ll look like you’re over-reacting and entering the realm of the Grammar Nazis. Please don’t go there again. You lose credibility.

    Not following up on what you posted – especially a strong denunciation – is also a place you don’t want to go. Another credibility-losing stance. Respect your contributors and commentators.

    Your apology was noted and appreciated and retrieved the situation.

    If its a Russian Site? So What? Gone are the days when to drop the word Russian into a conversation is a conversation-deadener. Russia Today is an informative and authoritative website, as is Al-Jazeera from Qatar.

    Do their owners have agendas? Of course. Massive, regional agendas.

    Does that mean we fall for the Ad Hominem approach to winning an argument? No.

    Its Russian sourced? Well, duh!

    We examine each story on its merits.

    As for Snowden, why is it beyond the pale that he gave information to someone else.

    For my part I believe ALL his revelations are a mere distraction and as such I prefer investigations which following a definite line of investigation – such as yours Daniel.

    But you don’t cover stories beyond your relatively narrow focus and I am also very interested in the Big Crimes, the ones that dwarf drug trafficking – the laundering of the money by international banks, the creation of corporate safe zone by the Trans Pacific and Trans Atlantic Trade Agreements, the Genocide being committed in Syria and Gaza.

    I’ll take informed comment on those where I can get it and that includes Global Research.

    I’ll end on this note. There is an awful lot of infighting between people who are publishing whistleblowing stories. I read of one dispute between members of AE911Truth.org. I know others disputed with the late Michael Ruppert.

    This shouldn’t be happening. Stick to the facts. If the story is “loose” and only picks up on SOME of the facts, say “thanks” and delve deeper.

    Can I respectfully suggest that vilifying someone because of sloppy journalistic standards is not encouraging them to improve. Right now we need as many investigative people as we can get.

    Personally I think you need a bigger organization to really achieve some ground breaking results, but each to their own. I was a sole trader for many years myself.

    Good luck with the work and thanks for what you have accomplished so far.

Comments are closed.

Most Popular

Daniel Hopsicker from 1998

Cancelled Book Orders

Keeping Mad Cow Alive

Recent Comments

Richard Yount on Keeping Mad Cow Alive
John Marden on The Wolves of Wall Street
josey carreiro on The Wolves of Wall Street
David A Howard on The Wolves of Wall Street
Chris Fogarty on BUT ME NO BUTTIGIEG’S
Chris Fogarty on BUT ME NO BUTTIGIEG’S
BThePrisoner on BUT ME NO BUTTIGIEG’S
Peruvian Marchingpowder on 140 Days After the Perfect Crime
Gayle Washburn on CONTAINER SHIP CRIME WAVE!
Chris Williams on Is JPMorgan the ultimate plug?
Teresa A Bacon on I Come Back with News
notjonathon on I Come Back with News
Philip Zozzaro on I Come Back with News
revtombrown on I Come Back with News
Bob In Portland on We Get Letters
riley on We Get Letters
David Koski on Jada & ‘the boys’
Mark Winchester Sr. on Jada & ‘the boys’
notjonathon on Jada & ‘the boys’
jo henrion on Jada & ‘the boys’
mike smith on Contact Us
Tim Landry on email
Florida on Oleg & Me
Jim Mayhew on Marc Harris Behind Bars
King Kangaroo on What is plagiarism?
King Kangaroo on What is plagiarism?
King Kangaroo on What is plagiarism?
King Kangaroo on What is plagiarism?
King Kangaroo on What is plagiarism?
King Kangaroo on What is plagiarism?
King Kangaroo on What is plagiarism?
Rob Macfarlane on What is plagiarism?
DEDSTIK on What is plagiarism?
King Kangaroo on What is plagiarism?
Kent Andrews on bushfellas
Neil Pearson on Contact Us
mat burk on Contact Us
John M Gretchko on Donald Trump, Banana Republican
Lamont Cranston on Donald Trump, Banana Republican
John M Gretchko on Donald Trump, Banana Republican
TIM SHERRILL on PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN
Deborah D Dulude on Tim Kaine’s Unlikely Biography
Deborah D Dulude on Tim Kaine’s Unlikely Biography
Anthony McArthur on Tim Kaine’s Unlikely Biography
Withheld for personal safety on 2016 election decides who controls the drug trade
Withheld for personal safety on 2016 election decides who controls the drug trade
Larry Brungardt on Marc Harris Behind Bars
Larry Brungardt on Marc Harris Behind Bars
Fed Hopsicker will delete this on THE STORY OF 9/11 IS A STORY ABOUT SAUDIS IN FLORIDA
Digitus Impudicus/Palmer Eldritch on Did Tom Cruise helicopter clip doomed ‘Mena’ plane?
george Archers on Jeb Bush’s 9/11 problem
Herr der Elf on Jeb Bush’s 9/11 problem
darkwhistle on Jeb Bush’s 9/11 problem
TheHolyCrow on Jeb Bush’s 9/11 problem
Ortaine Devian on Jeb Bush’s 9/11 problem
Ortaine Devian on Jeb Bush’s 9/11 problem
Wendy Painting, PhD on Archive
Etta Redinsfier on A Muckrakers Life, Interrupted
Ron, from australia on A Muckrakers Life, Interrupted
Christian Gains on A Muckrakers Life, Interrupted
Gary Sandritter on A Muckrakers Life, Interrupted
c coaler on “Hatto’s” List
Roger Mills on Archive
Doug Fisher on Archive
Chris Sapp on Archive
Trevor on 77
Mike on radaris
Lyle Grosjean on “I AM JULIAN ASSANGE!”
Thomas S. Bean on The Real American Desperadoes
Thomas S. Bean on The Real American Desperadoes
Thomas S. Bean on The Real American Desperadoes
Thomas S. Bean on The Real American Desperadoes
Thomas S. Bean on The Real American Desperadoes
Frank Di Bello on The Real American Desperadoes
California Granny on The Real American Desperadoes
ted rubinstein on The Real American Desperadoes
ted rubinstein on The Real American Desperadoes